Back to Academy
Relevance 8/10Prompting and EvaluationAdvanced7 min read
Math Reasoning Evaluation
Math reasoning evaluation checks intermediate logic and final numeric correctness.
Why it matters for annotators
Math evaluation projects reward rigorous reasoning verification.
Visual mental model
Problem -> reasoning steps -> correctness and logic score.
Examples (bad vs good)
Scenario: Real annotation scenario involving Math Reasoning Evaluation
Bad: Labeling quickly without applying project rubric.
Good: Applying rubric criteria, documenting rationale, and escalating uncertainty.
Common mistakes
- Skipping guideline details for edge cases.
- Applying inconsistent criteria across similar samples.
- Avoiding escalation even when uncertain.
Submission checklist
- Read the latest guideline update before each batch.
- Apply rubric dimensions explicitly in each decision.
- Escalate ambiguous items with concise rationale.